Okay, yeah, so it is kind of like this part:
So, for discussion, lets just say I’m a fundamentalist christian, and bible is literal to me (I’m psychologically allergic to reason). Now you present me with this new foundation of reason. Why would I replace my fundamentalism (which enables my other mental shortcuts and saves me the work of logic (which is why I’m a fundamentalist)),…, why would I replace my fundamentalist foundation with your reasonable foundation, when it as a method of spiritual enlightenment is fairly immediately threatening the value/purpose of my current method of spirituality?
A) Does my question make sense?
To me, my question feels like, basically reaching back to my point about the environment enabling the value for one’s such experience of fundamentalism, and the need for our strategy on this issue to address the environment which so enables that way of “spirituality”.
B) Does that perspective make sense?
C) What am I missing?