Is Trump a fascist?

[cont.]

In my writing and interviews, I have consistently referred to Donald Trump as a fascist. I have received a great deal of resistance to that claim. Do you think this description is correct? If not, then what language should we use to describe Donald Trump?

One of the problems with American discourse is that we just assume everybody is a friendly democratic parliamentarian pluralist until proven otherwise. And then even when it’s proven otherwise we don’t have any vocabulary for it. He’s a “dictator.” He’s an “authoritarian.” He’s “Hitler.” We just toss these words around.

The pushback that you are talking about is 95 percent bad. Americans do not want to think that there is an alternative to what we have. Therefore, as soon as you say “fascism” or whatever it might be, then the American response is to say “no” because we lack the categories that allow us to think outside of the box that we are no longer in.

Is this a function of American exceptionalism?

Yes, it is. We made a move towards intellectual isolationism in a world where no kind of isolationism is possible. The fact that democracies usually fail is a rule which can’t apply to us. If you examine American society, there are high points and low points. But there is certainly nothing which puts us in a different category than other people who have failed, whether it’s historically or whether it’s now.

I don’t want to dodge your question about whether Trump is a fascist or not. As I see it, there are certainly elements of his approach which are fascistic. The straight-on confrontation with the truth is at the center of the fascist worldview. The attempt to undo the Enlightenment as a way to undo institutions, that is fascism.

Whether he realizes it or not is a different question, but that’s what fascists did. They said, “Don’t worry about the facts; don’t worry about logic. Think instead in terms of mystical unities and direct connections between the mystical leader and the people.” That’s fascism. Whether we see it or not, whether we like it or not, whether we forget, that is fascism.

Another thing that’s clearly fascist about Trump were the rallies. The way that he used the language, the blunt repetitions, the naming of the enemies, the physical removal of opponents from rallies, that was really, without exaggeration, just like the 1920s and the 1930s.

And Mr. [Steve] Bannon’s preoccupation with the 1930s and his kind of wishful reclamation of Italian and other fascists speaks for itself.

[cont.]

[cont.]

  1. The most important point of disagreement that I have with Ana’s points at the time is that she seemed to be contemptuous of the central claim that Trump was (and still is to this day) a would-be dictator. [I apologize if I’m not 100% correctly summarizing Ana’s points.]
    I care much less about whether we call Trump a “Fascist” (specifically) than I do care about TYT commentators understanding that we are dealing with a man and a movement which have given off many tell-tale signs for nearly a decade now, of seeking to end the rule of law, and start a pseudo-free-society that is ruled by the caprice of a man or group of men, with all of the violence, chaos and injustice that this would entail. Yes, I know the country is almost there anyway, but that is no excuse for failing to diagnose when we see a person and a group of hysterical consumed-with irrationality backers who are in the final analysis trying to put an official end to what is a flawed-but-good Constitution.

I might add, another hallmark of some violent dictators of the 20th century, and their regimes, from what I can remember of my studies, is their attacks on reason itself… their attempts to bend perception of the truth, even to make a point that they control citizens and their perception of matters. This describes Trump “to a T”. I am struck, just to cite one example, of Trump’s recent disagreement with the reporter, when the reporter recognized that the “MS13” tattoo was clearly a fake. It was important to Trump to get the reporter to go back on his perception of reality. We should keep this in mind as he and his enforcers attempt to take this path with so many of us. In the end, it is probably Trump’s attacks on reason itself that turned me against him when I first paid attention to his candidacy in 2016, whether it was his attempts to deny reality, or deny the value of clear logic, reason and rationality (such as his heavy reliance on and championing of ad hominem reasoning), or some other stratagem against reason.

Cenk rightly said at the time that even if we are put back on our heels and do not use the term “fasicst” (because of the claim, however debatable, by some in the conversation that the term cannot be applied meaningfully) we are still left with the key point which is how do we describe a would-be dictator? In watching the other day, I saw him continue to get some of this right. I am quite disappointed that TYT does not seem to have interviewed Snyder, and have my share of other criticisms of TYT, but there many ways in which I am not disappointed with TYT, nor with Ana. She’s often a very good or even sometimes an exceptional voice. I don’t want to spend my time criticizing her so much as straightening out that we do need to talk about the direction of Trump toward violent authoritarian rule, whether we decide that is rightly called fascism in his case, or something else..

Sorry, can’t find it; but my memory is good and I know I saw it. Six months ago BEFORE Trump got seated, she had that fascist argument with Cenk. Subsequent to that, after some demonstrably fascistic policies getting acted on, there was a screenshot from another Prog outlet with her having a slightly embarrassed face and next to her was an “Oops”. It might not have been a formal apology made on Turks, but it was an embarrassing acknowledgement for her.

It is really hard to find it because of the mountain of Prog youtube releases in response to Trumpers “flooding the zone” with batshit crazy actions+orders…

Hi,

Thanks for taking a look, and I’m sure you saw something, but I will believe she reversed herself on this matter when I see it.

As far as I know, she had the sharp disagreement with Cenk approximately end of October, which is three months before Trump took the oath of office.

This link has some further comments she made around that time. She was not backing away from her comments. It’s not that helpful to the effort to see if she has changed her views, but it is helpful in understanding how deeply she was committed to her point of view at that time:

Progressive Commentator Throws Water On Democrat Attempt To Brand Trump A Fascist
Progressive Commentator Throws Water On Democrat Attempt To Brand Trump A Fascist
Kasparian recently revealed that she abandoned the Democratic Party after she was sexually assaulted by a homeless man.
By Daily Wire News
Oct 30, 2024 DailyWire.com

Again, the less important issue to me here is whether the exact right term for Trump was “fascist”. However, Ana in the link above did not even understand the extent to which Trump was committed to some sort of Constitution-undermining liberties-undermining authoritarian rule. That is the main issue for me.