…
(maybe check out this related topic thread)
…
Of course, an issue here is that individual members of such organizations can’t all be individually available to invest the effort to become such integrated/generalized experts, and, some members are actually personally opposed to other organizations which their organization ideally should explicitly integrate with; which could lead to (perhaps typical) leftist infighting, but ideally could be also integrated and overcome, given there are valid bases for disagreements to be compromised / synthesized / hedged. Not so integrating inhibits organizations from their/our potential effectiveness. Another issue is, as @cenkuygur has pointed out on the show, each organization (mindfully) does not have a good idea of what we could/should/would do to help each other organization, together; let alone, even if we knew what to do, we don’t know the how-then-to-do-it next step, (which I might think is more or less actually a single step process).
I’ve been thinking about, basically, organizing a network of organizations. Like, let us here at TYT do what we do, and also, have part of what we do be to network with an organization which further networks with all the organizations doing what they each do. Then, this shared organization of general-experts could work to integrate, (for examples), how Haitian liberation organizes themselves, with how we at TYT organize ourselves, with also, feminist praxis organizations, economic praxis organizations, ecological praxis organizations, etc. By working so broadly, such an organization-network could critically propose answers to questions such as those Cenk posed, and help to integrate potential answers and feedback across each relevant organization, in order to ultimately improve all organizations’ effectiveness.