For context and the occasional pronunciation of the names.
For example, this story:
youtube .com/watch?v=7BWH-5F6UQ4
(can’t add links, so I put some spaces the URLs)
If you found that statue outrageous/sexualized, you shouldn’t search “French revolution” on google images.
The wiki page
en.wikipedia .org/wiki/French_Revolution
features on the right side (2nd picture) a painting of Eugène Delacroix called: “La Liberté guidant le peuple” (Liberty guiding the people).
It’s a woman with exposed breasts, holding a rifle and a French flag, leading the people among the dead bodies and the smoke of the revolution (en.wikipedia .org/wiki/French_Revolution#/media/File:Eug%C3%A8ne_Delacroix_-_Le_28_Juillet._La_Libert%C3%A9_guidant_le_peuple.jpg)
I’d argue a piece of art is sexualized by the viewers, and it’s more likely to be sexualized by viewers that come from sexually repressed areas/cultures/countries.
The statue of David is a good example of a statue that has nothing sexual about it, despite it being fully nude. And it also commemorates a battle, where someone died.
There are tons of examples:
en.wikipedia .org/wiki/Antonio_Canova#/media/File:Antonio_Canova_Teseo_defeats_the_centaur.jpg
Here are a bunch of statues of Hercules, and he’s almost completely naked in all of them:
commons.wikimedia .org/wiki/Statues_of_Heracles,_Hofburg
But I don’t think any of them is sexual.
I don’t know how it is in the US, but such statues are nothing special in Europe. The examples above are just a few from Vienna, but you can find similar art all over the place.
Just my 2 (hundred) cents.