Yeah, it makes total sense that Ahmadinejad was co-opted. That’s been their modus operandi, right? Kompromat?? Bribery?? [I’m waiting for the shoe to drop some time from now on how Germany and Italian political leadership has been co-opted to block an EU embargo/sanctions for Gaza and Lebanon. When that happens we can all do our best Claude Rains impersonations -“We were shocked! Shocked!!”]
With regards to Lebanon, I can see a zionist saying: “We have to grab the land of Lebanon -they are shooting over the border at us!” Shooting over a border by non-State actors is a serious matter for any country; and the first stop to make is at the UN, to try and get peacekeepers involved -and they have been involved in Lebanon! A French soldier got killed there recently. If you need more intervention, make the case to the UN. Once you demonstrate that help has been asked for and none given, only then can other remedies be considered.
But the Times suggesting the Iranian nuclear program under Ahmadinejad being a false flag? Hmm, that one is a bridge too far for me. The Israelis always saw a Middle Eastern nuclear-enabled state as an roadblock to their greater Israel plan.
Curiously, a Middle Eastern country that is nuclear-enabled [and could provide security guarantees for Iran, Turkey, possibly even Lebanon…], Pakistan, is suddenly seeing border attacks from Afghanistan. Coincidence? Ya’ think the Mossad (or CIA, which is now almost indistinguishable from the Mossad thanks to Trump and Loomer…) are passing weapons again to the Afghanis, to try and remove Pakistan as a nuclear player?? “Pakistan is too unstable now in their fight with Afghanistan -we have to remove their nukes for the safety of the WORLD!”
Well, the zioworld, right?