So a thought that crossed my mind the other day, but with your guys help you maybe be able to help me expand further on this topic, in both intra/inter aspect to similarly related topics that my relate. So basically it’s collectively coming up with a explanation aka using both psychological vs sociological standpoints to form progress resolution. I’ve noticed that the age gap between politicians vastly discerns their judgment on perception, for obvious reasons. Now I pose to look from both psychological and sociological standpoint. This is a system intended to analyze such paradigms , “Life span development and the life course perspective deal with disparate (explananda) but share common (explanantia) (explanatory strategies). Both approaches originated by introducing into the subject matter of age an innovative and sometimes courageous emphasis on context, inspired by discoveries of cohort differences and historical variations in patterns of aging. Despite these promising beginnings four decades ago, key aspects of the relation between lifespan/life course and context remain largely undeveloped, because of an undue reliance on traditional paradigmatic assumptions in both traditions, which we here call the positivist–functionalist model. What remains yet underdeveloped and in need of extended interpretation are the fundamental bases of human development and human social relations. These bases include two dialectically interrelated dynamics that are elements of a social-constitutive model, which recognizes that (1) individual development and agency are not just influenced, but constituted by lived experience in a specific social context, and (2) social systems are constituted only through agentic human action. This paper identifies theoretical resources that can be used to further this inquiry, and illustrates the value of such resources by showing how they can be used to illuminate the problems of agency, linked lives, and questions of the relationship between lifespan/life course and evolutionary thought.” This a great framework view things grasp ideologies lost in culture war. reaffirmation and patience lends me strength to continually press on, and rethink my approach. As long as critic offered is healthy and meaningful inquisition, I welcome it!!! It not only provokes thought, but allows for an individual to form a more full comprehensive view on said topic, truly understanding what I’m trying to convey. So this situation right here is a great example of how analyzed my intentions and took the patience to not only grasp my theology, but build on it as well. This would an example of explanda being my way analyzing through my life experiences and you explantia talking the time to work together collectively. Applying both standpoints will generate a more easily understood message, leading to more provocation in thought, to really be innovate as collectively whole ,rather than being just stuck in your perception alone. This a great framework view things grasp ideologies lost in culture war. reaffirmation and patience lends me strength to continually press on, and rethink my approach. As long as critic offered is healthy and meaningful inquisition, I welcome it!!! It not only provokes thought, but allows for an individual to form a more full comprehensive view on said topic, truly understanding what I’m trying to convey. So this situation right here is a great example of how analyzed my intentions and took the patience to not only grasp my theology, but build on it as well. This would an example of explanda being my way analyzing through my life experiences and you explantia talking the time to work together collectively. Applying both standpoints will generate a more easily understood message, leading to more provocation in thought, to really be innovate as collectively whole ,rather than being just stuck in your perception alone.
When rural communities become integrated ( people of color move in) the racism usually spikes with violence and pushback. But the children ( like with your sleepovers) will learn so look at their colored neighbors as equals because children are INNOCENT and untainted, So it will get worse before it gets better, but I do believe exposure is the most effective tool in learning. Rural areas don’t just have a high white population % but they also watch FOX, which keeps the fearmongering going and work too keep them ignorant.
I have personal experience with this from my youth. (I grew up on a 200-acre farm) Saw my first dark-skinned person when I was around 13 years old. (I’m from rural Norway)
That’s exactly leads to my next topic I was about to discuss. How we not only I identify these biases, but actually hold them accountable or expose them in a national way, because honestly they’re root of cause for spreading propaganda messages that are flourishing in those areas, not to mention they usually have strong community culture and very hard headed when adapting to other cultures, it gives me the sense of fear to step out of their bubble.
Sorry for the typos I hate autocorrect, when I’m using my phone instead of my computer lol
I love how Jayar Jackson put it on TYT today " THEY ARE SO WHITE" their communities are literally 100% pure white. From 0 - 100 years old, they might not have MET a person of another skin color. That’s how they stay ignorant
I think actual journalism and interviews of rural citizens are needed. If you talk to them and show their opinions then more people will become aware of the differences and how protected they are in their bubble. The Daily Show has send out Jordan Klepper to interview and their videos are great
I’m actually about to start doing this, wish me luck and support!!
Good luck I bet TYT would be interested in those interviews!