So, I was asked to touch on this topic by a friend and community member. We have seen some of us “argue” from places of cynical fatalism; it is hard to even witness (and, frankly, even harder to intervene). That said, I can try, and so let me start with a recent post from a kindred spirit:
Surely much more can be added, to clarify and expound. Please feel free to add anything more in the comments below. And let me start with a few topics: real hope, perspective, critical thinking.
First, Real Hope.
Real hope is the option available when one might say all hope is lost. Real hope is not like playing a game in which you think you have a slight chance of winning, and as such you might still “hope” to win. Rather, real hope is like playing a game which in all likelihood you can only lose, and as such you can now choose to be hopeful that you could win because of some factor beyond all that you know.
As an analogy, imagine a card game, and you have this standard deck of 52 cards. All the potential cards and all the combinations and all the relative odds are knowable. In such a game, you might know you could only win if you draw only one specific card out of the 52 cards, and you have only one draw left before you lose. This is not the best way to think of real hope. Rather, perhaps, you know you have no possible way to win, no possible card, with one more draw before certain loss. Real hope is now an option; perhaps you’re wrong in your belief of having no possible option, and you made some mistake in analysis. Then when you draw your last card, you could draw the right card you needed to win, and then realize how your previous assessment of no possible option was in fact incorrect. (In many games, a competitive player might have conceded early, and never been the wiser).
But even further, actually, the game we’re playing is not so possibly certain nor knowable. Further, it is psychologically preferable to think in cynical and fatalistic patterns, (ie: because of power differentials, complicated factors, historical patterns, trauma, etc) such that our unknowable and uncertain world can appear to us as knowable or certain. This dynamic lends itself to cynicism, because we then feel like there was no hope, and we might complain about how others seem crazy because they have apparently illogical hope in apparently hopeless things.
As such, building from the previous analogy, it is important to remember that our game has a fundamentally unknowable amount and distribution of cards in the deck, (even if we may have some partial knowledge and estimations).